The asset allocation that I had chosen for my retirement account was 65% equities and 35% fixed income. I further broke the equities down to 27.5% Canadian, 22.5% US, 10% International and 5% real estate.
For some (strange) reason, I was managing my taxable and non-taxable accounts separately. Well, that doesn’t make sense since they are all trying to achieve the same goal: my financial independence when I retire.
So, I looked at my whole portfolio together. My current allocation is as follows:
Cash 16.67%
Fixed Income 21.57%
Canadian Equity 25.91%
US Equity 18.29%
International Equity 11.53%
Real Estate 6.03% (does not include my home)
Note: The reason for the high cash component is that I had a GIC come due recently which I have not yet reinvested. If I add the cash and fixed income together, I get 38.24% for fixed income. So, my whole portfolio is still well within my asset allocation.
After having done some reading and thinking about my asset allocation as a whole, I have decided on a new asset allocation. Not radically different or anything. Here it is:
Cash 5%
Fixed Income 30%
Real Estate 5%
Canadian Equity 25%
US Equity 19%
International Equity 14%
Emerging Markets 2%
Basically, I have added a cash asset that I didn’t have before. The cash asset includes money that I have purposely allotted for investment. Also, I have decreased my US equity and increased my International equity. I was reading that the US and Canadian equity markets are highly correlated. However, the International equity markets are not as highly correlated.
As I add money to my portfolio, I will add to those allocations that are below their designated weighting.




3 users commented in " My Current Asset Allocation "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackThanks for posting what your asset allocation is. I always enjoy reading about other people’s approaches. Just wondering why you allocate so much of your portfolio to Fixed Income. I am not saying this is wrong, but would just like to understand where you are coming from. You are a pretty young guy (as per your About Me section) - my approach is to keep my fixed income lower as I feel I can get a better return that way. I consider myself a little bit more open to risk however. Anyway, I would be interested to hear your thoughts.
Basically, I happened upon my asset allocation model from various things:
1. When I was in my 20s, I had invested in an aggressive portfolio with CIBC. It was one of those managed funds that rebalance your portfolio for you. Well, it was heavily weighted in equities and did very poorly.
2. John C. Bogle (of Vanguard fame) suggests that a person have their age in fixed income.
3. Just finished reading “Protect Your Nest Egg” and the authors suggest 70 equity/30 fixed income should be the upper scale for aggressive investors. In this book, they look back at the last 15 years, and the best performing asset class was — bonds! Go figure.
4. Last year, I had read an article that pension funds tend to use a 60/40 - 70/30 split equity/fixed income.
Any reason I picked this allocation? Probably because I seem to see that allocation a lot in my readings. Also, since I am fairly new to DIY investing (just over a year now), it is safer as I have the fixed income to prop me up.
Asset Allocation
Ben Lawler CPA & LPL Financial Planner * Contact: (310) 866-8976
Asset Allocation: Why Style Diversification Makes Sense
If you are one of the many Americans who believe your best investment strategy is to buy low and sell high, you may want to explore the merits of asset allocation. Studies of some of America’s major pension funds have shown that an asset allocation policy is the major determinant of portfolio performance.
As the enclosed illustration “Alternating Leadership: Why Style Diversification Makes Sense” demonstrates, asset class winners and losers tend to change frequently, and in some cases, reverse completely from year to year. Although no investment strategy can guarantee success, a properly allocated portfolio is more likely to participate in positive investment trends while at the same time reducing volatility when the investment climate changes.
The asset weightings in your portfolio will depend on your individual situation and financial objectives. As your circumstances change over time, your financial advisor can adjust the weightings in your portfolio to reflect your goals. For example, in your earlier investment years, you will probably want a larger portion of your assets invested in stocks, for long-term growth. Although past performance cannot guarantee future results, equities have historically outperformed other investment classes. As you approach retirement age and start investing more conservatively, you may want to shift more of your assets into less volatile investments, such as fixed income instruments.
If you would like to learn more about asset allocation, and how it might benefit you, contact me today at (310) 866-8976 or via my website at http://www.benlawler.com
Leave A Reply